The Indian motorcycle market is brimming with choices for buyers looking for performance, style, and value. Among the top contenders in the 200cc to 350cc category are the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V. Both bikes cater to different segments but often get compared due to their pricing, performance, and brand appeal.
Let’s break down their differences to help you decide which one suits your riding needs better.
Design and Road Presence
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 carries a neo-retro design with minimalist aesthetics. Its circular headlamp, teardrop tank, and short wheelbase give it a classic street bike vibe. It looks sturdy and muscular—appealing to riders who prefer a premium old-school presence.
In contrast, the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is an aggressively styled streetfighter. It has sharp tank extensions, LED DRLs, split seats, and race-inspired graphics. It looks modern, sporty, and is clearly built to attract younger performance-seekers.
Engine and Performance
The Hunter 350 is powered by Royal Enfield’s 349cc J-series engine, producing 20.2 BHP and 27 Nm of torque. The engine is tuned for refined low-end performance and city cruising. It’s ideal for relaxed, comfortable commuting and occasional highway rides.
On the other hand, the Apache RTR 200 4V comes with a 197.75cc oil-cooled engine that churns out 20.82 BHP and 17.25 Nm of torque. It feels quicker off the line, with crisp throttle response and multiple riding modes (Sport, Urban, Rain) that enhance its versatility.
Ride and Handling
Hunter 350 offers a planted, stable ride, thanks to its weight and center of gravity. However, it’s not the most flickable in city traffic. It’s built for comfort, not aggressive cornering.
Apache 200 4V excels in handling with its lightweight chassis, sharp turning ability, and suspension tuned for performance. It features preload-adjustable Showa front forks and a radial rear tyre, which provide great grip and feedback.
Features and Tech
The Hunter 350 gets a semi-digital instrument cluster, Tripper navigation (optional), USB charging port, and dual-channel ABS.
The Apache RTR 200 4V, being more feature-rich, offers a fully digital display, Bluetooth connectivity, navigation, riding modes, gear shift indicator, glide-through technology, and slipper clutch. It’s clearly ahead in the tech department.
Mileage and Practicality
- Hunter 350 delivers around 35-38 km/l in real-world conditions.
- Apache 200 4V offers better mileage, averaging 40-45 km/l depending on riding mode and traffic.
In terms of fuel economy and maintenance cost, the Apache is a more economical choice.
Pricing (Ex-showroom, Delhi)
| Bike | Price Range |
|---|---|
| Royal Enfield Hunter 350 | ₹1.49 – ₹1.74 lakh |
| TVS Apache RTR 200 4V | ₹1.47 – ₹1.53 lakh |
Highlight Comparison Table
| Feature | Royal Enfield Hunter 350 | TVS Apache RTR 200 4V |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | 349cc, Air-Oil Cooled | 197.75cc, Oil-Cooled |
| Power | 20.2 BHP | 20.82 BHP |
| Torque | 27 Nm | 17.25 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Riding Modes | No | Yes (Sport, Urban, Rain) |
| ABS | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |
| Fuel Efficiency | 35-38 km/l | 40-45 km/l |
| Display | Semi-digital | Fully digital with Bluetooth |
| Navigation | Optional Tripper | Built-in via app |
| Riding Position | Relaxed, upright | Sporty, aggressive |
